The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 05:53, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Effect.AI[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unreliable connected sources. ToT89 (talk) 07:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Only sources are press releases / churnalism from unreliable cryptocurrency blogs. - MrOllie (talk) 12:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG unders standard crypto failings. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 02:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clear failure of WP:GNG Reddragon7 (talk) 04:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly promotional content Dr-Bracket (talk) 18:26, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also worth noting, creator has just been topic banned User_talk:Shuwun1991#Topic_banned_for_promotional_editing Dr-Bracket (talk) 00:40, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.