The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 15:40, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eli Mansour

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability tag on this article for 5 years. I see some occasional reference to him in the US Jewish press, but nothing more than a note that he's speaking. No substantial secondary source coverage. Article was deleted in 2007 but recreated at some point after that. Can't speedy because I don't know if the content is the same. agtx 15:12, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: sources in article certainly don't establish notability; coverage consists of announcements of speaking engagements. Vrac (talk) 15:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 18:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 18:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks indepth coverage to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet general or academic-specific notability criteria Avi (talk) 17:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aish HaTorah is a superbly well known platform for lectures, outreach, etc. in the Orthodox Jewish arena and having spoken for this group on numerous occasions, he is notable as a speaker within Orthodox Judaism. In depth coverage is not necessary to establish notability. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 02:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)'[reply]
Aish is unquestionably notable, but not all of its speakers may be. Just being associated with a notable institution is not ipso facto proof of notability. Conflating the person for the institution only works when the metonymy is true (like "R' Avrohom Yehoshua's" or "R' Tzvi Kushelefsky's", when referring to the yeshivos that they head). Please see Wikipedia:Notability (academics)#Criteria. -- Avi (talk) 05:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* Weak Keep But the article needs to be improved. Katerina dunaway (talk) 03:26, 28 July 2015 (UTC) — Katerina dunaway (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sockpuppet of Sofiamar (talk • contribs). [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.