The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It's still unclear to me why a redirect to Lulu (company), a book-on-demand company whose article does not mention Sutton, would make any sense as a redirect, but feel free to create one.  Sandstein  19:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elise Sutton

[edit]
Elise Sutton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Dom web-site operator. Claims to have published two books, but they're both from a vanity press. Much promotional detail, no reliable sources, and a quick spin through Google only pulls in a large number of very low-quality hits. CalendarWatcher (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Linux.com "A new venue for selling open source software" Nov 18, 2004 [1] Article about Lulu, says "Female Domination" was best-selling title at the time. Rationale for merging to Lulu article.
  • Think Magazine. Very brief book review in Czech entertainment magazine, both online and print.[2]
  • Who is Elise Sutton and why does it matter?[3] ( NSFW; some mature content ) Article in blog of sex therapist and BDSM author Gloria Brame. This won't establish notability, but should pass selfpub by expert and could be used in as one of the refs in an improved article. I'm not sure all the BLP sourcing requirements come into play because "Elise Sutton" appears to be a carefully guarded pseudonym.
  • Google Books shows something called "Worshipping Your Wife" that mentions her ideas, plus an Italian book on female domination, and a brief mention in a Spanish book called "Entretiempo" which I can't figure out but which seems more about literature and culture in general. Squidfryerchef (talk) 15:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.