The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. withdrawal by nominator Blurpeace 03:36, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elliot Greenbaum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not pass filmmaker notability guidelines; not sufficient for an unsourced BLP since last year. Blurpeace 16:58, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. If sources become available, or if the subject completes a project and gains some notability, we may wish to revisit this one; for now, though, delete. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 20:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correct spelling: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Keep per meeting WP:ANYBIO through 6 award wins, and meeting WP:GNG as a filmmaker with coverage in multiple reliable sources from 2002 through 2009.[1] Article needs expansion and sourcing, but such appears do-able through regular editing, and it needing to be done is a reason to do it... and not to delete an article on a notable individual in its lack. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.