The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 12:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elliot Servais[edit]

Elliot Servais (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable physician. Scholarly publications do exist, but they do not appear to rise to the level of WP:ACADEMIC, and notability is not otherwise shown by either a Google Books or Google News search. I do see a bunch of citations in the article, but they don't show notability. He may well have a bright, WP:NOTABLE future ahead of him, but I don't see it demonstrated right now.  Frank  |  talk  18:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• ___this page should be kept_ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karly2002 (talk • contribs) 13:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment - Could I ask you why you think the article should be kept? Favonian (talk) 13:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Only one cite. Karly2002 has edited only on this article. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• This page should be kept. I have worked with this physician. His research is actually very important. He is at the forefront of pancreatic cancer research and his lab has recently been awarded a major NIH grant. His case studies have been featured at numerous ACS conferences. Just look him up on Google. -Dr. Allison — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.201.179.190 (talk • contribs)

• Comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.201.179.190 (talk • contribs) has edited only on this article. Xxanthippe

• Delete per nom. He may have done valuable research there are not enough secondary sources cited to back the claim to notability. Favonian (talk) 14:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Subject requests deletion as written on Talk:Elliot Servais: I am Elliot Servais. While I appreciate the notion that someone feels I merit a page on this website, I would like this page to be deleted. The bulk of what is written is true; however, there is also misinformation on this page. Furthermore, I prefer the details of my career and personal life to remain private. I would kindly request the webmaster or other authorized administrator of "Wikipedia" to remove this page. To whomever put this up, please do not be offended and I do appreciate the notion. Thank you. (Diff). Lara 16:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and subject request. Lara 16:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.