The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Bad faith nom by now-blocked sock. —DoRD (?) (talk) 20:58, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Hagins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Listed for further debate. The article is about a young producer of an independant film which recieved a minor grant and who spoke at a minor conference. Further notability has not been established and the article continues to fail WP:CREATIVE. A search of websites mentioning the producer, images located on Google, and YouTube clips all appear to be self-promotion with no reliable third-party references Micro-Cruzer (talk) 20:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A convention notable enough to have a Wikipedia article... Notability is there in being invited to address a convention of this size, and being the teenage creator of a film notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Peridon (talk) 20:58, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.