The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 07:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Enchanted Boy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reviews as far as I can find, so it fails WP:NBOOK. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I see at least three reviews on ProQuest. IDs: 2076732857 (Pink Paper); 2216024704 (Gay Scotland); 2076709605 (Gay Times). AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:24, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:49, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:05, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, meets WP:NBOOK, multiple reviews as brought out above, and an additional review by PW here. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for the Publishers Weekly review and others mentioned. — Toughpigs (talk) 15:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per sourcing identified. Glee^anon 09:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.