- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:39, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Ensa Cosby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability on her own. Falls into category of WP:INHERITED. Fails WP:GNG. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Carrite: You say it fails GNG, but your !Vote was for "keep". You meant "delete", didn't you? -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 05:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoops, sorry about that! Carrite (talk) 07:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unless sources can be found proving otherwise, this wealthy daughter of a famous parent appears to have lived a private life. This article reads an an unwarranted intrusion on that life. If she wanted to be in the spotlight, she would have stepped into it. She appears has to have done so, and a mention of her in her parents' articles is therefore sufficient.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.