The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Enterprising Cambridge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage for these local events. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 14:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Single local event with no lasting news impact. Git2010 (talk) 21:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ^Message 18:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Delete transient event; marketing campaign; soon forgotten. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per Chiswick. Simply fails to meet our N guidelines.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.