The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker^{talk to me} 16:03, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Entrepreneur of Life[edit]

Entrepreneur of Life (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Accidentally nominated by Meclee at MFD with rationale of "Not notable, no category for article." Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:47, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - as unsourced original essay. Carrite (talk) 17:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Question: How is it possible to "accidentally" nominate an article (for anything)? Doesn't seem to make sense. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 19:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• He accidentally nominated the talk page instead, which resulted in it being sent to MFD. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Can find nothing but wiki mirrors, even when looking for the authors of the works cited. Tough to tell because everything seems to be in German, but seems not notable (FWIW, German Wiki has nothing on the concept). -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 20:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.