The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Environmental policy in China. Seek help with revision deletion of copyrighted content. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental governance in China[edit]

Environmental governance in China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essay-like piece that is duplicative of environmental policy in China. Amigao (talk) 01:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Environmental policy in China. BD2412 T 02:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and China. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger seems appropriate to me. Quite a lot of good content that's extensively sourced on "Environmental Governance in China" so I don't think we want to lose all that effort. But it is too much like an essay and the subject matter is duplicative of "Environmental policy in China." JArthur1984 (talk) 22:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I took an initial attempt at merging some of the information into the environmental policy in China page. JArthur1984 (talk) 22:59, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect As I discussed with JArthur1984, some of the text that was moved from this article to Environmental policy in China set off CopyPatrol, and not as mirrored Wikitext, but rather, text from a copyrighted source doi:10.1080/09644010600562567 (many editors won't be able to access that article, but 180 words from it were copied to the Environmental Governance article at some point long ago). That doesn't bode well for additional texts in the article. I believe the article's name should redirect and any information taken from the article should be thoroughly cleansed before attempting any kind of merger.  Spintendo  07:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to the copyvio. Jumpytoo Talk 02:08, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.