- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete. Speedy deleted by RHaworth as A7, G11. (non-admin closure) K.e.coffman (talk) 22:28, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Equidate[edit]
- Equidate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable, and promotional . This is a Press release, based on press releases and notices. Amazingly, even the NYT article is essentially an advertisement for them. There is apparently no source about business that is always reliable for purposes of notability, making the GNG useless in that area. DGG ( talk ) 23:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.