The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-06 08:04Z

Estonian Orthodox Church Pilgrimage

[edit]

Blog or something like it. A few obscure entries from Gogle but nothing notable. -Nv8200p talk 02:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - makes no assertion of notability. The fact that fifty people did something together one weekend is simply not notable by itself, and the article makes no attempt to take it any further. --Hyperbole 02:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 05:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable. It's not some big scale event, just a small gathering of people. Terence Ong 05:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - kind of strange, just the recap of an event it seems. I dont think it belongs to, or adds value to wikipedia so I am going for delete. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 12:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Sharkface217 20:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: as far as I know it is consistent with the Eastern Orthodox traditions, but the style of the article is more suitable for a newspaper article than for an encyclopedia, if it was not a religious theme I would say: get rid of it, but as it is I'd have to say clean it up which is kind of difficult. Alf photoman 23:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: this article is a good example of a religious event. Why is it any less significant or notable than anything else? Bebuddley1 14:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete. NN. Wikipedia is not a diary, however worthy the event being chronicled. I am encouraged to visit Estonia though - the food sounds great, especially the "lihapirukas". But we're an encyclopedia, not a tourist brochure. WMMartin 17:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Relevant information may find its way to the articles of their church and general religious tradition or suchlike, whatever they are. Maed 08:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.