The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. All of the content was a copyright violation, which left literally nothing left in the article. That being said, I have no objection to a copyvio-free recreation of the article, as the one keep rationale suggested some notability there. –MuZemike 19:43, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extreme Measures (novel)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article states no notability or importance, and I was only able to find one critical review via Google (although this may be somewhat complicated due to the fact that there is an unrelated movie of the same name). It is therefore my belief that the article fails Wp:GNG and WP:NBOOK. Inks.LWC (talk) 10:32, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Inks.LWC (talk) 10:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The novel was a NY Times Bestseller. Reviews abound in Google News. Much of it is behind pay walls but I picked out a couple that are viewwable without forking over $$$$: Bangkok Post, Minneapolis Star-Tribune. -- Whpq (talk) 13:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.