The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

F. R. Carrick Institute[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks notability, and the page is currently just an ad for the institute. Search for secondary sources resulted in only fluff pieces or blogs criticizing individual researchers. Page could be merged with Frederick Carrick, but it suffers from the same problems. The Institute is listed on the Clinical neuropsychology page as a "US university" which it isn't, as far as I can tell. Of two references, one is a broken link, and it led to the Institute's own page. - Tim D. Williamson ^yak-yak 03:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. - Tim D. Williamson ^yak-yak 03:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Subject is not notable, content violates WP:OR and WP:PROMO.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 21:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:ORG. Only primary sources provided. LibStar (talk) 15:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.