The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. GDonato (talk) 20:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FECRIS[edit]

Notability has not been proven, since the article (still) has no third party sources, relying solely on the one primary source(org's website. Sfacets 11:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - try to first resolve the unreferenced tag in the article. Quick google search comes up with [1] [2] [3] and[4], which appear to be attributable enough for Wikipedia. Be advised that there's an organization with the same name, and thus may result in attributing events to the wrong organization. --Sigma 7 03:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not appear to meet WP:ORG, WP:V and WP:RS. The article has been tagged for 5 months and it still does not assert notability. Vegaswikian 19:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Espresso Addict 17:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 24,000 google hits - definitely notable and verifiable. Mukadderat 17:45, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Here are some good key sources that could be used to expand the article - [5]. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 19:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.