The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FILMguerrero[edit]

FILMguerrero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A "record label" business enterprise article that is entirely devoid of sources now and a few minutes of WP:BEFORE assessment shows low hope for the article ever meeting notability standards for organizations/companies. Graywalls (talk) 22:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Oregon. Graywalls (talk) 22:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - in agreement with the nominator. The company has released some albums that are notable, but it has never received any reliable coverage in its own right to qualify for company notability. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The page has 0 sources to even check notability. I searched but couldn't find any sources which are reliable.CourtseyDriver (talk) 23:34, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Found no suitable sources, too. Suitskvarts (talk) 06:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.