The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FNC: Uncut[edit]

FNC: Uncut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced (and tagged as such since 2009) article about a television series with no strong claim to passing WP:TVSHOW. To be fair, this was created at a time when Wikipedia commonly (albeit unwisely) extended an automatic presumption of notability to any television series that verifiably existed regardless of the state of sourcing, but that's long since been deprecated and a television series now has to show a WP:GNG-worthy volume of coverage about it in sources independent of itself -- but I can't find any evidence that this has any such thing, and it also doesn't help that this is simultaneously categorized as an American television series while being stub-sorted as a Canadian one, leaving its actual production nationality in question. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this show from having to have media coverage. Bearcat (talk) 16:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.