The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Cirt (talk) 07:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fabie subdivision (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable court documents; obvious republication of existing documents, which begs the question of whether or not copyright violations are involved. mhking (talk) 04:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.