The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy and Legends Organization

[edit]

None of the 39 unique Googles appears to be a reliable source. No evidence of meeting the primary notability criterion, namely that it has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Guy (Help!) 16:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[1], [2] and [3] are independent of the subject.--otherlleft 19:53, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But not reliable sources. Guy (Help!) 22:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I like it, but...well, I like it. Sorry. --Dennisthe2 00:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-noteable and lacks any sources, therefore it fails WP:V. Davidpdx 01:28, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.