The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No further information or sources about the medal have been forthcoming. Can possibly be recreated with better sourcing and understanding of Wikipedia editing practices.  Sandstein  09:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Farahnaz Forotan[edit]

Farahnaz Forotan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Earlier removed (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farahnaz Forotan) as being a promotional BLP and failing WP:GNG. After a little detour through a sandbox and AfC it is now back. There are some sources added, but as far as I can decipher them, they fail WP:RS The Banner talk 09:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The original author has added numerous extra sources, but I think he does not understand WP:RS. Most sources contain statements given by ms. Forotan, but do not write about her. The Banner talk 18:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Author admits a clear WP:COI. See File:Farahnaz forotan.jpg where he states: Farahnaz Forotan is a female Afghan Journalist. this is her official Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/FForotan/ she asked me to help her to write her bio on Wikipedia and she has Permitted me to use her photo for her bio. The Banner talk 12:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.