The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fatima Sohail

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. This bio comes under WP:BIO1E, fails WP:NACTOR, WP:ANYBIO. Störm (talk) 13:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Having several sources and being divorced from someone notable is not a one way ticket to notability. Fails WP:ANYBIO. James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 13:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO1E and WP:ANYBIO.CodeLyoko^talk 18:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:SNOW, WP:RS, and WP:GNG. Sourcing is from gossip papers. She hasn't done anything notable, and doesn't even make any allegation of notability. Bearian (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete based on WP:ANYBIO. Being divorced from someone notable does not mean the person is notable. It also appears to be a case of single-event notability. Taewangkorea (talk) 02:46, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.