The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, meaning not delete. Future merge subject to editor's discretion. --PeaceNT (talk) 16:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fifi Le Fume[edit]

This character does not establish notability independent of Tiny Toon Adventures through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the section in the main article is enough. TTN (talk) 18:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the Fifi Le Fume article should be deleted at all. Tkerekes13 (talk) 4:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

By the way, which main article do you mean? Please let me know. Tkerekes13 (talk) 4:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Merge to Tiny Toon Adventures. McWomble (talk) 07:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, StarM 04:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Tiny Toon Adventures. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 12:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tiny Toon Adventures per above. Not notable enough out-of-universe. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To the closer This discussion should be included in the group nom at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babs and Buster Bunny. - jc37 15:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is very well written and just needs more references. It includes obvious information that are know by anyone who has seen the series. The character has too much of info to be deleted. If it was deleted please send me a copy of the source so I may work on it till I find enough sources to post it again as an article. --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 13:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.