The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Filipino martial arts. MBisanz talk 02:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Filipino ninja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This stub fails WP:NOTE and could possibly be a hoax as well. -MBK004 04:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE and possibly CSD G3 (Vandalism) or CSD G1 (nonsense). It is such a mess, and I doubt that we can ever improve it. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:47, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Redirect target While it is quite flattering to include them in the ninja article, I think that it would be as inaccurate as merging Samurai and Knight (both are orthodox warriors of different cultures while Ninja and Kublan are unorthodox fighters). Judging from the scant data, we only know that the Kublan employ camoflague and ambush tactics and the similarity with Ninjas ends there. Should this be merged/redirected, I suggest that the target be Filipino martial arts instead.--Lenticel (talk) 02:07, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Filipino martial arts works. Squidfryerchef (talk) 05:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.