The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 13:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fine Game Girls

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blimey. Haven't done one of these in a while. Apologies if I suck at it.

Deletion per WP:N, no claim to notability made, no sources provided and nothing pops in a cursory search other than 1st party content. Ultimately, a YouTube channel with no notability at the moment. Previously deletion proposed using WP:PROD but page creator challenged since I wasn't logged in, so I created an AfD. Greg Tyler ^{(t • c)} 17:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:N and WP:V. Woodroar (talk) 03:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It did not have a single hit in a video game reliable sources search. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar ♔ 21:52, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG, lacks coverage. This web based video series has no claim to notability, nor any independent coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 01:23, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.