The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 23:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First2Save[edit]

Possibly fails notability guidelines. I am not able to locate any sources that confirm it being the most successful eBay business; possibly a spam hoax. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 00:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources to verify claims of notability. Jujutacular ^talk_contribs 19:42, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This eBay store is mentioned in a couple of articles about the owner, Mark Radcliffe. [1], [2]. But coverage about the store itself in those article is very thin. Insufficient coverage to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.