The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:08, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First Presbyterian Church of Marcellus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not appear to satisfy the relevant notability guideline, WP:ORG or the general notability guideline WP:N, although it is a very nicely written article. Edison (talk) 02:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• keep seems to have substantial material from a book, and also a newpaper ref. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:21, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Well-written, historically significant. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Historically significant and has independently verifiable third party sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep while some parts of the article do appear to descend into trivia (for example, a complete list of pastors), the church does appear to be of local historical notability and reliable sourcing doesn't seem to be a problem. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote this several years ago, so it can go if it needs. Mitch32^{(New digs, new life, same old stubborn.)} 00:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Adequately sourced, notability established.LM2000 (talk) 02:52, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.