The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:34, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fitim Haliti

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The player appears to fail WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Contested PROD. Spiderone 07:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Spiderone 07:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 07:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete (A7), article does not assert notability. Beyond that, fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. GauchoDude (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, playing in a notable European top-level league. Eldumpo (talk) 08:10, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- Where is your evidence for this? He has played in this league but it doesn't make him "notable". All he has is the usual Soccerway, Transfermarkt, Playerhistory stuff which is not enough for an article on an encyclopaedia. Spiderone 08:16, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteUnless you have evidence of this player playing a game in UEFA competition it's deletion as the league he plays in runs Semi-pro. Govvy (talk) 16:51, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.