The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| [express] || 05:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Food and Beverage Technology[edit]

Food and Beverage Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't see this having significant coverage. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 09:10, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 09:10, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete - WP:A7 or WP:G11. Article was created by WP:SPA dedicated to promoting these "magazines" via spam and similar. Grayfell (talk) 09:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be the same spam farm as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manufacturing Technology Insights Magazine. Grayfell (talk) 09:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - insufficient notability now MenfesKidus40 (talk) 01:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.