The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect discography to main artist article. Delete individual song articles since there is nothing worth merging. --PeaceNT (talk) 05:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frankee discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

How You Do (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Watch Me (song)‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unnecessary list. What little information there is—the artist has 1 album and 3 singles—is included in the artist's own article. Prod was removed by an editor with ownership issues. The artist's 2 non-charting, non-notable singles are included, redirects were reverted by the same editor. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 09:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ——Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 09:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect the discography article to the relevant section of the artist's (Frankee) article, and merge and redirect the songs to the album (The Good, the Bad, the Ugly (album)). Neither article is at a size where splitting these sections out is productive, and making readers jump through extra hoops to get to the information they need makes for unhappy readers. The discography section can be split back out at a later date when the content of both the article and her back catalog expand to the point where we start having WP:article size issues. The non-charting singles can be split back out if later events cause more WP:reliably sourced information to be produced that demonstrates that these songs pass the general WP:Notability or the WP:Notability (music) guidelines. -- saberwyn 11:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - These articles are perfectly sourced and are worthy of their own articles. Surfer-boy94 (talk) 12:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - As argued above, these articles are sourced and they do deserve their own articles. Motion-In-The-Ocean (talk) 13:42, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sourced? You two did notice the grand sum of one reference between all three articles? PC78 (talk) 16:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: Motion-In-The-Ocean is suspected of being a sockpuppet of Surfer-boy94. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Surfer-boy94‎. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 19:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Invalid - Motion-In-The-Ocean / 59.100.253.232 confirmed as same user as Surfer-boy94 by Checkuser. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 16:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge & redirect per saberwyn. The biography and discography are both too short to warrant seperate articles. The non-charting singles have minimal notability and content, and can be adequately covered in the album article. PC78 (talk) 15:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge & redirect per saberwyn.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 07:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge & redirect per saberwyn. Nom's rationale implies a content fork, which means a merge is appropriate, and deletion is not. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I don't see how a redirect is warranted in this case. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 13:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • A redirect is a warranted because it is a plausible search term, extremely plausible given that someone thought it appropriate to create the article. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • If someone is looking for information on Frankee, they'll go to her article first and that's where the discography is. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 14:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as merge is unnecessary with so little information. –thedemonhog talk • edits 23:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.