- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Freda Ayisi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL having never played in a fully professional league or for a senior international team. Ayisi also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of significant coverage. Dougal18 (talk) 16:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 17:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 18:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - only one source [1] covering her in depth. The rest is just passing mentions in things like match reports. Not close to meeting GNG Spiderone 18:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I reached same conclusions as the nominator, and Spiderone's vote fully settles it. Walwal20 talk ▾ contribs 16:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - Article about semi-pro footballer which doesn't appear to satisfy the GNG. The Islington Gazette article is in-depth coverage, but pretty much everything else is routine (e.g., transfer announcements) or superficial (e.g., violent conduct incident with an opposing goalkeeper). Jogurney (talk) 21:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:53, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:GNG. Interesting behavior in the contribution history. Hmlarson (talk) 23:57, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the restored ref [2] is reliable and independent but, in my view, not quite enough for GNG. I'd possibly sway to keep if there were one more source of similar strength along with that one and the Islington Gazette Spiderone 08:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.