The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:24, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Free Faizan Campaign[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some popularity in social media which is considerably outdated. If Amnesty International was interested in this incident then there had to be more sources than these WP:NOTNEWS. My Lord (talk) 12:32, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The News search for the title failed to give any notable result. Absolutely Zero useful result on books. Failed WP:NEVENT and recommending delete per WP:NOTNEWS (Disclosure: I have been a significant contributor to the article)--DBigXray 13:09, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:31, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and fails WP:NEVENT .He was arrested on February 23 2011 for stone pelting, Amnesty issued an appeal and on 30th March they submit a report to Chidambaram and he is released on 5th April there is no long campaign for him .Now if the subject was a minor at the time of the incident there would be BLP concerns.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:18, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:GNG. There are enough sources in the article including one to a book. 39.57.242.20 (talk) 07:56, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And the sources you provided on article are exactly WP:NOTNEWS,[1] a couple of them being unreliable. Accesscrawl (talk) 08:45, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Nowhere near enough coverage to justify an article. --RaviC (talk) 11:27, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEVENTS, this appears to be an event that neither demonstrates precedent nor is it a catalyst for something else of lasting significance. Ifnord (talk) 18:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.