The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 14:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

French tuesdays (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:EVENT (I read it as an event, it's really hard to understand) and WP:GNG. Bluefist ^talk 23:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete Per ((db-promo)) which states "Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic." There are sources like [1], [2] and [3], but the article "need(s) to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic", as stated in the ((db-promo)). Nimuaq (talk) 01:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Spam. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.