The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frog day[edit]

Frog day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Nonsense article. It claims the festival to be a "long running holiday" that is "celebrated on the first Friday of October" that started in the "1600s". If it were a genuine Chinese festival from that time, it will follow the Chinese calendar, not Western week-based calendar. Voidvector (talk) 19:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Voidvector (talk) 19:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Bastille Day for obnoxious people who might look there Mandsford (talk) 20:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Do not delete until the author has given his/her input. Badagnani (talk) 21:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Gsearch not coming up with this particular holiday (and zero gnews hits), so either a hoax or non-notable. (I'm also not getting much notability for World Frog Day on March 20, so no point in rewriting the article to focus on that.)--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for failing verifiability and notability and for generally being nonsense. Edison (talk) 05:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC
• Delete Non-notable and unsourced. Reasons enough, even if it wasn't an obvious hoax.Yobmod (talk) 12:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.