The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:55, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fun Punch

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable EP that appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. The article literally consists of 3 tracks, a small infobox, and nothing else. No prose whatsoever, not even a track length or a reference. The only reliable source a Google search turns up is a mention on AllMusic, but even they don't have a review on it - or even the album art. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 19:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable per nom. Nothing more to add. Bearian (talk) 16:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.