The result of the debate was delete. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 03:35, Jan. 27, 2006
Google has no hits,non notable, the title is very close to the first part of the authors user name so it's most likely a vanity.
-Right, it's just to show what GAJ is, to those who are curious.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dead Decoy (talk • contribs) 08:57, 21 January 2006
- I say keep. The site is a good one, and from what people are saying, it has a good and interesting history. It might even give them some members to help their cause, which they are trying their best to fight for. Its the case of David vs Goliath, and would you side with Goliath?220.236.118.182 01:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)Adam Shields[reply]
Ok, now that it's been cleaned up and the "users" section is cleared, is it really biased enough to warrant a Point of View warning? --User: GAJ Snake 15:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- No harm is done haveing it... and it could be of use...