The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Rewriting the article can be done at editorial discretion outside the ambit of WP:AFD. Kurykh (talk) 04:03, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Galidor: Defenders of the Outer Dimension (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, also being completely unsourced, and receives prominent vandalism with no care by the majority of editors, wherefore it should be deleted. Lordtobi (✉) 06:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Yashovardhan (talk) 08:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Yashovardhan (talk) 08:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Yashovardhan (talk) 08:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep GNG is met with [1], [2], which (among others) discuss how it was a terrible show that existed to market Legos. Merge to some aspect of LEGO might be reasonable as well, but it's a real, nationally-aired television show, even if a "forgettable" one. Oh, and vandalism frequency is a concern, but not a reason for deletion. Jclemens (talk) 18:59, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as Stub - Most of the existing content needs to be deleted, but the page should be kept. Power~enwiki (talk) 22:56, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as stub - everything past the opening two paragraphs is just plot details that really aren't worth keeping in this situation; and I know I've seen actual sources about the development of the show and toyline somewhere that could contribute better to the page Jessietail (talk) 07:03, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.