The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Game Unicon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Does not establish notability, quick google search only shows up things on blogs and forums, not exactly RS and seems to be either press release or self generated. It will be in the future, and this WP:CRYSTAL on upcoming notability. The site (http://www.gameunicon.com/) implies a lack of notability and has plenty of hyperboles. The original contributor is a obvious WP:COI ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Event has not even taken place yet, how can it be notable? The Isiah (talk) 05:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then it fails WP:CRYSTAL and is why I nominated it. "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." It's certainly going to take place, just not notable. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No assertion of notability. Don't see how it's speediable, though. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 13:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. JohnCD (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete can't find any RSes. Removed prod as it is at AfD. Hobit (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.