The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep and merge (non-admin closure) with Garib Rath Express . Ruslik (talk) 06:20, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Garib Rath[edit]

Garib Rath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

does not assert notabilty; unsourced; style not consistent with WP tradition Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 02:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Indian Railways Garib Rath Express. Possible search term, not inherently notable.--CastAStone/^{/₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€} 02:49, 15 July 2008 (UTC) (edits made CastAStone/^{/₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€} 13:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

• The proper name for the train is Garib Rath, so I suggest the reverse. Merge Garib Rath Express into Garib Rath ChiragPatnaik (talk) 15:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• There is nothing in Garib Rath worth merging. Maybe we should delete the current version of Garib Rath; move Garib Rath Express to Garib Rath, and then leave a redirect in its place...?--CastAStone/^{/₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€} 13:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed, That's what I meant. BTW, who will close this? ChiragPatnaik (talk) 13:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Google news turns up tons of different news articles giving mention to "Garib Rath"[1] and I think that amount of news results would make the article notable.  Atyndall93 | talk  03:20, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Redirect to Garib Rath Express - Atynda1193 is correct. There is a lot of in-depth secondary coverage of this type of service which has become significant in India transporation. Here are more secondary sources] on the topic. --Oakshade (talk) 03:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per User:CastAStone. The article is mostly a train schedule. JIP | Talk 06:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• That's a reason for article improvement, not deletion. --Oakshade (talk) 06:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not an admin, so I don't know if my two bits count, but I'd say Keep it. Someone has to improve the article for sure. But, there is no reason to delete it, If you see Google Trends URLthere is interest in this area as compared to Rajdhani Express(which has a article. Cheers ChiragPatnaik (talk) 10:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Garib Rath Express, probably as suggested by ChiragPatnaik. We do not need two articles. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:33, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.