The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:56, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gaur Gopal Das[edit]

Gaur Gopal Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person. Like any other motivational speaker, his name appears in lists of speakers at events, but the sources provided in the article do not show how he meets WP:GNG. The awards he has won are not notable, and the article looks very much like a promotional effort (just like most of the sources quoted are). Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion. bonadea contributions talk 15:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 15:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 15:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have few questions

want some more? Who are we to decide his notability, Answer is... Yes, we are just a common people. We are not any CEO of Google or Administrator of British Parliament, who knew his notability very well, to invite him to their office to enlighten people minds. Thanks for reading this! Have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaveenNkadalaveni (talkcontribs) 16:25, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but the followup question to those claims has to be "where are the sources for that"? You already know that Facebook and Twitter accounts are not indicators of notability as Wikipedia defines it, but it looks like you might be under the impression that sources have to be online (if I interpret your comment "finding traces of notability over internet" correctly). That is not the case. Most online sources are useless as far as showing notability is concerned, and many offline sources (books published by reputable publishers, reliable printed newspapers and magazines, etc) are perfectly acceptable as sources as long as they actually support the information in the article. There are no sources at all for the claim that he was especially invited by Google's CEO (and I'm sorry, but that in itself would not mean the person was notable as Wikipedia defines it), and the sources for his speaking in front of Parliament are not independent/secondary (and again, his speaking there is not a claim to notability in itself. Many people do that. If theie speech is discussed in secondary sources it's a claim to notability, if not, it's not.) --bonadea contributions talk 15:06, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.