The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowball delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:37, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gayline SF[edit]

Highly likely to be a hoax, and if not, then it's certainly not notable enough for Wikipedia. Master&Expert (Talk) 18:28, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Clubmarx (talk) 19:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Hoax. I can't find any sources (reliable or unreliable). Schuym1 (talk) 23:16, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (A7) — no indication of notability, whatsoever. MuZemike (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, it does assert some level of notability - "Due to popular demand, Gayline only performs special venues." Which is why this should be open to discussion. But I doubt anybody would disagree if I prodded it. Master&Expert (Talk) 04:04, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per MuZemike. JuJube (talk) 00:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 18:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 18:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Either a hoax or massively non-notable. Zero non-wiki ghits, zero gnews hits, and no hits for this group at sfgate.com, the website for SF's major newspaper.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.