The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gaytime TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Small tv show that ended some years ago. Not notable. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:04, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not enough notability is asserted for this article. Hello32020 22:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. Pioneering show, the first entertainment show for lesbians and gay men on British television. Attracted considerable press coverage at the time and after and if you're not nice I'll dig it all up and annoy you by showing you what a stupid nomination this was. Incidentally it used to be the number one most requested redlink on the 'to do' list on everyone's watchlist. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 23:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please, assume good faith here and be civil. If you can dig up said information, that will prevent the article from being deleted. In short, change our minds. --Dennisthe2 00:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Asserts notability, but no links on the site. I'll leave it to Fys (above) to get those - the article certainly could use it. --Dennisthe2 00:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC) (vote changed, see below)[reply]
• Delete, though if Fys can dig up that mass press coverage I don't mind changing my mind. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 00:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Source here (repost of Gay Times article), non-trivial mention here in American national gay magazine, tons of articles on the hosts that mention the show and the Gaytime TV awards and their recipients. Sufficient to establish notability IMHO. Otto4711 06:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Otto4711. And, as always, the references need to be in the article, not just the AfD. Tevildo 06:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• A show that ran four years on the BBC is certainly notable enough. Keep. Bearcat 10:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - references added to article, including praise from Daily Mail. Eludium-q36 12:20, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, my mind is changed. Good show! --Dennisthe2 01:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Multiple non-trivial references. —ShadowHalo 05:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.