The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No objections to speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gennady Golovkin vs. Kell Brook

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I originally PROD'd this based on non-notable, unreferenced listing of results. When contested all that was added was the BoxRec entry which only shows that the even exists. The main issue of notability remains. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable championship fight with 500,000 PPV buys in the UK, main fight aired in several countries including on HBO in America. Copious amounts of coverage before and after the fight from mainstream media outlets: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Naue7 (talk) 20:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 14:38, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:02, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There's no article here right now. There is potential for an article - perhaps a move to draft space would be in order until someone is ready to flesh it out. --Michig (talk) 07:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm just commenting because I've grown tired of WP arguments and accusations. This article has no references except for a link to the fight results (which is the sum total of the article). It way well have had the viewership claimed but many sporting events are viewed by millions but that doesn't make them notable. As it stands I don't see any evidence that either WP:GNG or WP:NEVENT is met. Michig's suggestion to make it a user's draft page seems reasonable. Papaursa (talk) 21:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 23:05, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.