The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lots of single purpose accounts here... Thanks everyone for contributing and please remember to assume good faith with my closure. If you want to discuss undeleting this article, please request it at deletion review, not on my talk page. Thanks! SarahStierch (talk) 02:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gerasim Avsharyan

[edit]
Gerasim Avsharyan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo of a nonnotable Russian psychologist - Altenmann >t

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)so the search engine does not find much.

And so can we find more: books Parsbol (talk) 20:34, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The correct search brings the results:

books

State Library

publishing house "Praim Evroznak"

publishing house "Krylow"

publishing house AST

Senatw (talk) 09:12, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simply being in the Russian library is not notable. The "best 8 books" says best of the second half of 2007 so it's not an entire year, just the last 6 months of 2007. And it's not an award just an article. And it's only one source, which isn't enough on its own. -- GreenC 18:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:56, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 04:03, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.