The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 16:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Giovanni Germinario (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) –

Based on the following web search:

• Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

there appears to be insufficient reliable sources independent of the subject to comply with the notability guideline. PhilKnight (talk) 22:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This seems to be a puff piece, written by the subject (judging by the username). No independent sources to meet N. --GedUK  17:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as notability is not established. Reads as if it was written by the subject also. ₳dam Zel 17:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - cannot verify material, also big WP:COI and WP:WEASEL issues as well. -- Darth Mike ^(talk) 02:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.