The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt. Sandstein 21:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gisela Baurmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Encountered this as a new page reviewer. This article was previously deleted and in recent months has been moved in and out of mainspace and draft space as its creator seems determined to run with it despite it not being accepted at AfC. It categorically fails WP: ARCHITECT in my view, and the sources are mainly to a single design competition that the subject entered and did not win. In view of the clear notability fail and the creator’s insistence I’d suggest delete and salt. Mccapra (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt. No notability apparent. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete. At best this could be a redirect to World Trade Center Site Memorial Competition per WP:BIO1E but it would need to be protected as a redirect to prevent the kind of abuse we have already seen. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep on basis of WP:ARCHITECT(2) regarding subject of publications and WP:ARCHITECT(4c) regarding competition finalist status, which holds true despite mention of WP:BIO1E. Quatern (talk) 00:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)— Quatern (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

@Quatern: WP:ARCHITECT(2) says ‘The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique.’ What new concept, theory or technique do you claim Baurmann originated? WP:ARCHITECT(4c) says the subject’s work ‘has won significant critical attention’. Which of her buildings do you claim has received this? Mccapra (talk) 06:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.