The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. No arguments to keep presented in two weeks. Uncontested requested deletion. Lara 19:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GladRags

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This "article" has been tagged for nearly a year as non-notable and lacking references for the same period with no improvement. Also reads as an advertisement. Previously proposed for deletion a year ago with ambivalent results but the near-complete lack of attention to improving the article demonstrates its lack of notability. It's just a tiny company's brochure masquerading as an article of note. B.Rossow ^talk_contr 16:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:09, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I should have noted in the original rationale that this article doesn't come close to passing WP:CORP. -- B.Rossow ^talk_contr 15:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While I'd tend to say the feminine menstrual cup market isn't covered well, the reality is that I couldn't find reliable sources to confirm notability of GladRags. In fact, I could only find one article about the company that possibly wasn't a press release. (in case anyone can access it, see "Courtney, Emily", "Delicious Living; Oct2007, Vol. 23 Issue 10, p16-16, 1/3p, 1 color", abstract: "A list of feminine-hygiene products which can be utilized by women during menstrual period is presented. They include the divacup with a silicone cup, gladrags reusable menstrual pads, organic cotton tampons from Natracare company, and chlorine- and fragrance-free sanitary pads from Seventh Generation Inc.", ISSN 15365980). tedder (talk) 03:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant delete - Hard to believe this hasn't been covered somewhere, such as the feminist press; but seems to be the case. Fails WP:V and WP:CORP. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.