The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Dicdef linked to sales site, no proper sources or evidence of notability either Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:43, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glas chairm[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of a number of occult-related stubs which are nothing more than dictionary definitions. Unable to find additional sources. –dlthewave ☎ 20:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:18, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:37, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Apparently the name of a specific incantation rather than just a generic dictionary definition, but even on the scale of modern occult topics, there's essentially no sourcing here – and not a single source that approaches the project's standards for referencing and inclusion. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:08, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:DICDEF based only on a source that looks to be tied to a commercial jewelry website. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 10:29, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete single sentence article and as per above. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 10:41, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.