The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Blanco.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filipino artists. No reliable references. All belong to the same family and created by the same editor. Bgwhite (talk) 06:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These articles were created by a group of editors (not a single editor). A list of all those editors and their articles is available at Wikipedia:School and university projects/Philippines artists. DL9C (talk) 09:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Its possible the family as a whole is notable, harder to make a case for the individual artists. A couple of references [1] [2] [3] Paulbrock (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & Redirect all articles as suggested by Paulbrock, as a group the family appears to be notable per criteria #4 of WP:ARTIST, per the references provided by Paulbrook. That being said, individual members do not appear to criteria set forth in WP:ANYBIO. Therefore, since the individual articles fall within the scope of a notable group, in this case their family, a redirect and merger of referenced content to a new article named Blanco Family Museum, or Blanco family, would be appropriate.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the creator moved the page to the Draft: namespace; I've undone the move for now. ansh 666 06:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect-as said above. Wgolf (talk) 16:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and is pure promotion. No point in a redirect to a non-existing article; even if several family members are notable, there is no indication they meet GNG as a family, so that's a tough sell. —Мандичка^YO 😜 20:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the creator of the article of "Michael Blanco" and it is considered for deletion. I have add a few photos and bibliography recently. If that's not enough for references, I would like to request to move my article to the draft namespace.--User:Ms.popsie21 — Preceding undated comment added 21:49, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.This is the creator of the article of "Peter Paul P. Blanco". My article is considered for deletion. I added some reference and bibliography. If it is not still enough, I would like to request to move my article to the draft namespace.--User:Uknown624 Unknown624 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: comment on added sources helpful please Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please add new comments below this notice. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and is pure promotion. Quis separabit? 20:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.