The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close as a malformed duplicate nomination. Presently, a proper deletion discussion is occurring at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glicaramide (2nd nomination). (non-admin closure) A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 01:12, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glicaramide[edit]

Glicaramide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems weird to submit my own article for deletion. It was procedural, based on the discussion here. The threshold for inclusion for chemicals, the notability needed. Glicaramide is not very notable, deleting it or not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertMel (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.